I am separating from my wife: she got a check for child support that I think disproportionate and s

I am separating from my wife: she got a check for child support that I think disproportionate and shared custody with placement of the same at her in the marital home to where I need to go away; I would like to propose the alternation, with my wife, in the house since you asked so much.
From reading the question, I seem to understand that it is in the course of divorce proceedings emmy nominees with his wife and that, following the first hearing the Presidential, the court has issued the so-called temporary measures and urgent.
Well, these measures constitute only provisional, being aimed at the management of personal and property issues until not reached on the final judgment of separation of the spouses.
In principle, however, as she tells me about child support for offspring "disproportionate" and promises to remedy this disproportion l 'alternation of spouses in the marital home, I consider emmy nominees - before you answer to your question - to dwell on these two issues.
Preliminarily, it should be clarified that the obligation to support children, emmy nominees connected to more parenting duties (education, care and education) goes far beyond the simple satisfaction of basic needs and essential part of the child, as it requires parents - even if separation - to cope with a variety emmy nominees of needs of children, which can not be attributed only to the maintenance obligation, but they are inevitably extended appearance housing, education, sports, health, social, moral and material assistance, the appropriate predisposition - until their age so requires - a permanent home organization adequate to meet all the needs of care and education [1].
For the quantification of maintenance works to the children the law [2] sets out a number of benchmarks for the judge who does not, however, constitute an exhaustive list and limited but, on the contrary, also having a formulation fairly generic, it suitable to be integrated and better specified emmy nominees according to specific individual cases.
In particular, the parameters specifically dictated by the code are made in the first place, from the current needs of the child and the standard of living emmy nominees enjoyed by the son in the constancy of living with both parents.
Specifically, the reference to the current needs of the child is a measure intended to ensure that the child is not prejudiced in its serene growth due to the pathological stage crossed by parents but that, on the contrary, are nevertheless fulfilled its normal requirements, as happens in the united family. emmy nominees
Connected with this is the second parameter emmy nominees (the standard of living enjoyed during the marriage) that is intended, however, to avoid any distortion in the life of the child, for the quantification of maintenance should be done not only considering the needs of the children based on their age and other needs of employment and social integration, but also in relation to the standard of living enjoyed in the constancy of living emmy nominees with both parents, emmy nominees "living emmy nominees standards determined by the confluence of income and parenting resources" [3].
These two parameters are certainly to be considered together emmy nominees with the others listed in the standard: it is, in particular, the "time emmy nominees spent with each parent," the "economic resources of both parents"; the "economic value of housework and care given by each parent."
In other words, the consideration by the court of the economic situation of parents is essential emmy nominees in determining the contribution to the maintenance, since, obviously, you can not think of ensuring their children more than their parents, with their economic capacity, are able to do.
This is so true that, in case there is a deterioration of the income of the parents in the course of time, this can justify a change request [4] of the measures concerning the maintenance of the offspring (understood, in this case, as required reduction of the contribution).
As to the parameter of the economic value of household chores and care given by each parent, it means that the court, in determining the extent of the check, must take into account the fact that the parent who does not work (or works part time ), however, has contributed (and contribute) in a different way (but not least) the needs of the family, not just for allowing another savings in terms of use of such figures more domestic workers and / or babysitter but also for allowing the spouse to devote himself to the working activity without hindrance whatsoever.
But we must also have regard to the time of continu