The previous practice of the reform, in particular, oscar award winning movies allowed the defendan

Home Training Courses Databases Massimario.it Exams and Concorsi.it AltalexMese.it FormularioCivile.it FormularioPenale.it Point & Lex Services Data Banks and mortgage amortization tables DannoBiologico.it List Default interest Interest Lawyers Legal Revaluation Istat Taxation Acts Check VAT eBook Books Lawyer oscar award winning movies Media Books Books Books Cedam Utet Legal Codes contacts advertising forum chat eu help
Contents: 1. Introduction - 2. Compliance with the procedural rules and the valuation of the conciliatory oscar award winning movies - 3. The findings summaries prior to the enactment of interim measures - 4. The necessary adoption of objective criteria and predetermined - 5. The incidence allocation oscar award winning movies of the marital home - 6. The objective criteria and predetermined clearance of maintenance adopted by the Court of Monza (Table 2008)
The "new" legislation on substantive and procedural law of the family is, by now, going to the achievement of the third year of life and, therefore, oscar award winning movies soon will no longer even be defined as such.
The inevitable shortage of references established case law of legitimacy is beginning, gradually, to be remedied by the numerous decisions of the lower courts, helped by the necessary requirements for speed of processes in the field of family.
If, however, many of the innovations introduced by Law no. 54/2006 have been widely and thoroughly eviscerated (think of the issues of foster shared allocation of the marital home, the direct payment of the check to the adult children), the same can not be said as to the liquidation of the contribution to the maintenance of the spouse and children and the criteria that should orient.
In fact, the law n. 54/2006 nothing has innovated with regard to the maintenance of the spouse and you are limited as to that of the children, to list a series of parameters sincerely very general and difficult to apply in practice.
Once again, therefore, the doctrine and jurisprudence are called upon to make up for the absence of reliable and indisputable criteria oscar award winning movies of quantification of maintenance: the conclusion that
may be considered in some respects inevitable, but that would have required the support of other and more certain reference points, at least with respect to the situations most recurrent and statistically more usual.
This apparent lack appalesa even more deleterious with respect to the decisions taken or to be taken at the hearing Presidential: the moment of greatest conflict between the parties, with the inevitable and justified psychological involvement and human of all the protagonists of the process, the President is called to take measures designed to last and to cut deep into the lives of others, working "without a net" and with few certainties.
The law n. 54/2006 oscar award winning movies introduced a considerable simplification of procedures for the activation of judgment and imposed on the parties, their representatives and the same judge a series of virtuous behavior, intended to ensure transparency and speed of judgment.
With primary reference to the rapid establishment of the process, it has been until now always respected the short-term (five days from the filing of the appeal at the Court) for the presidential hearing, as well as its place in the end of days. 90 by the lodging of the application.
The law does not, in truth, all the aforementioned terms qualified as peremptory, insomuch oscar award winning movies that of an explicit sanction intended for their non-compliance can not be said to be coded.
The previous practice of the reform, in particular, oscar award winning movies allowed the defendant, in a high percentage of cases, to present memory and documents in limine litis, that same hearing set before the President.
This practice, not sanctioned in any way, has led to the judge and parties in a vicious circle and an established procedure anything but vowed to speed: the President oscar award winning movies had only hearing a rapid and inevitably superficial knowledge of the defenses of the defendant, while the defender of the applicant spouse often invoked to grant a postponement to examine the allegations and productions opponents.
Substantive compliance with the new rules, however, allows oscar award winning movies the President to consider well in advance (by the same set and assessed ex ante) defenses and documents of the parties and to ensure full knowledge of the case brought before it provisional jurisdiction, at least in them